Abstract

This article investigates the contributions of Iran and Turkey to the world information science literature. In this context, the study examines Iran and Turkey addressed publications in the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). Total number of publications of two countries in the information science journals was 140; 85 from Turkey and the remaining 55 from Iran. When analyzed in ten- year time periods, the number of Iran addressed publications shows a kind of instability with certain rise and decline whereas the number of Turkey addressed publications appears to rise steadily. The most preferred informa­tion science journal for Iran is International Information & Library Review while for Turkey it is Scientometrics. More collaborative work is preferred by Turkish scholars than their colleagues in Iran. The majority of Iranian publications come from authors with a librarianship background whereas Turkish publica­tions include authors with different backgrounds such as statistics, industrial engineering and physics. It is pointed out in this article that the number of pub­lications from both countries does not match their potentials. In this respect, both countries need to increase their contributions and thus have a betterposi- tion in the world of information science.

Keywords: Bibliometrics, Information science journals, National productivity- Iran, Nationalproductivity-Turkey

References

  1. Al, U., Fiahiner, M. ve Tonta, Y. (2006). Arts and humanities literature: Bibliometric characteristics of contributions by Turkish authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 57(8), 1011-1022.
  2. Atamer, H., Dorsan, K., Önder, L. ve Torun, K. (2002). 70 bin araştırmaya 5 trilyon teşvik. Cumhuriyet Bilim Teknik, 823, 10-11.
  3. Côté, G. ve Archambault, E. (2005). Scientific collaboration between Canada and developing countries, 1992-2003. Office of the National Science Advisor, Privy Council Office, Government of Canada için hazırlanmış rapor. 10 Nisan 2006 tarihinde http://www.sciencemetrix.com/pdf/SM_2005_002_CNS_Collaboration_Canada_Developing_Countries.pdf adresinden erişildi.
  4. Ebrami, H. (1975). Libraries in Iran. Encyclopedia of Library & Information Science. Eds. A. Kent, H. Lancaster ve J.E. Dailey, New York: Marcel Dekker. 13, 15-53.
  5. Ensafi, S. ve Gharibi, H. (2002). Iran knowledge in international level: 1999. Tahran: IRANDOC.
  6. Ensarı, N. (1975). Karnameye se salaye amuzefl ketabdar› der doreha› kotah modet” [Üç yıllık kısa dönem kütüphanecilik eğitimi raporu] Nameye Encumene Ketabdaran Iran. 8(4), 526-542.
  7. Ersoy, O. (1969). Ankara Üniversitesi DTCF Kütüphanecilik Bölümü’nün onbeş yılı. Türk Kütüphaneciler Derneği Bülteni, 18(4), 228-231.
  8. Garfield, E. (1983). Third world research. Part 1. Where it is published, and how often it is cited. Essays of Information Scientists, 6, 253-263. 31 Mart 2006 tarihinde http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v6p253y1983.pdf adresinden erişildi.
  9. Garfield, E. (1994). The ISI impact factor. Current Contents, 25, 3-7. 11 Ekim 2006 tarihinde http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/journalcitationreports/impactfactor/ adresinden erişildi.
  10. Gülgöz, S., Ö. A. Yedekçioğlu ve E. Yurtsever. (2002). Turkey’s output in social science publications: 1970-1999. Scientometrics, 55(1), 103-121.
  11. Harvey, J. (1989). Iranian information education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. 29(3), 177-96.
  12. Herrero-Solana, V. ve Ríos-Gómez, C. (2006). Producción latinoamericana en biblioteconomía y documentación en el Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) 1966-2003. Information Research, 11(2), paper 247. 28 Mart 2006 tarihinde http://informationr.net/ir/11-2/paper247.html adresinden erişildi.
  13. ISI. (2006). Social Sciences Citation Index. 31 Mart 2006 tarihinde http://portal.isiknowledge.com adresinden erişildi.
  14. ISI. (2004). Journal Citation Reports. 31 Mart 2006 tarihinde http://jcrweb.com adresinden erişildi.
  15. Küçük, M. E. (2004). Değerli bilgi çalışanları. (Editoryal). Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 18(4), 361-362.
  16. Kum, İ. ve Erdoğan, P. L. (1980). Turkish library developments. Unesco Journal of Information Science, Librarianship and Archives Administration, 2(4), 252-256.
  17. LISDIRAN. (2006). Library and Information Science Directory of Iran. 21 Mart 2006 tarihinde http://www.nouruzi.itgo.com/LISDIRAN/directory.html adresinden erişildi.
  18. Line, M. B. (1970). The ‘half-life’ of periodical literature: Apparent and real obsolescence. Journal of Documentation, 26, 46-54.
  19. Mehrdad, M., Heydari, A., Sarbolouki, M. N. ve Etemad, S. (2004). Basic science in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Scientometrics, 61(1), 79-88.
  20. Mezinani, A. (2000). Ketab ve ketabdari [Kitap ve Kütüphanecilik]. Tahran: Semt.
  21. Moin, M., Mahmoudi, M. ve Rezaei, N. (2005). Scientific output of Iran at the threshold of the 21st century. Scientometrics, 62(2), 239-248.
  22. Mortezayi, L. (2000). Berresiyi vezeyet tehsilat tekmili olum ketabdar› der keflverhay› Engelestan, Amrika, Hend ve Iran. [İngiltere, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, Hindistan ve İran’da lisansüstü kütüphanecilik eğitiminin incelenmesi]. Faslnameye Olum Etelaeresan›, 15(3). 21 Mart 2006 tarihinde http://www.irandoc.ac.ir/Journals/jr15.htm adresinden erişildi.
  23. Osareh, F. ve Wilson, C. S. (1997). Third World Countries (TWC) research publications by disciplines: A country-by-country citation analysis. Scientometrics, 39(3), 253-266.
  24. Osareh, F. ve Wilson, C. S. (2000). A comparison of Iranian scientific publications in the Science Citation Index: 1985-1989 and 1990-1994. Scientometrics, 48(3), 427-442.
  25. Osareh, F. ve Wilson, C. S. (2002). Collaboration in Iranian scientific publications. Libri, 52, 88-98.
  26. Ötüken, A. (1979). Kütüphaneciliğimiz için…: Milli Kütüphane nasıl kuruldu ve Türkiye’de kütüphanecilik öğretiminin tarihçesi. Ankara: TKD.
  27. Schloegl, C. ve Stock, W. G. (2004). Impact and relevance of LIS journals: A scientometric analysis of international and German-language LIS journals-citation analysis versus reader survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 55(13), 1155-1168.
  28. Soltani, P. ve Rastin, F. (2001). Danef lnameye Kitabdar›: Ferheg-i ‹ngilisi be Farsi [İngilizce - Farsça Kütüphanecilik Ansiklopedik Sözlüğü]. Tahran: Farhang Moaser.
  29. Tonta, Y. ve M. ‹lhan. (1997). Sosyal bilimlerde Türkiye’nin dünyadaki yeri. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 12(40), 67-74.
  30. Uzun, A. (1996). A bibliometric analysis of physics publications from Middle Eastern countries. Scientometrics, 36(2), 259-269.
  31. Uzun, A. (1998). A scientometric profile of social sciences research in Turkey. International Information & Library Review, 30(3), 169-184.
  32. Uzun, A. (2002). Library and information science research in developing countries and Eastern European countries: A brief bibliometric perspective. International Information & Library Review, 34(1), 21-33.
  33. Wilson, C. S. ve Osareh, F. (2003). Science and research in Iran: A scientometric study. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 28(1), 26-37.
  34. Yurtsever, E., S. Gülgöz, Ö. A. Yedekçioğlu ve M. Tonta. (2001). Sosyal Bilimler Atıf Dizini’nde (SSCI) Türkiye: 1970–1999. Ankara: TÜBA.
  35. Yurtsever, E., S. Gülgöz, Ö. A. Yedekçioğlu ve M. Tonta. (2002). Sağlık bilimleri, mühendislik ve temel bilimlerde Türkiye’nin uluslararası atıf dizinindeki yeri: 1973–1999. Ankara: TÜBA.

How to cite

Al, U., & Afzali, M. (2006). Contributions of Iran and Turkey to the World Information Science Literature: A Comparative Study. Information World, 7(2), 181-201. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2006.373