Referanslar

  1. Baysen, E., Hošková-Mayerová, Š., Çakmak, N. ve Baysen, F. (2017a). Misconceptions of Czech and Turkish university students in providing citations. A. Maturo, Š. Hošková-Mayerová, D.-T. Soitu ve J. Kacprzyk (Dizi Ed.), Studies in Systems, Decision and Control Series: Vol. 66 Recent trends in social systems: Quantitative theories and quantitative models içinde (s. 183-190). Switzerland: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-40585-8_16.
  2. Baysen, E., Hošková-Mayerová, Š., Çakmak, N. ve Baysen, F. (2017b). Misconceptions regarding providing citations: To neglect means to take risk for future scientific research. Š. Hošková Mayerová, F. Maturo ve J. Kacprzyk (Dizi Ed.), Studies in Systems, Decision and Control Series: Vol. 104 Mathematical-statistical models and qualitative theories for economic and social sciences içinde (s. 177-186). Switzerland: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-54819-7_12
  3. Çakmak, N. (2015). Undergraduates’ misconceptions concerning plagiarism. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 29(2), 212–240. http://www.tk.org.tr/index.php/TK/article/view/2543 adresinden erişildi.
  4. Evering, L. C. ve Moorman, G. (2012). Rethinking plagiarism in the digital age. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(1), 35-44. doi: 10.1002/JAAL.00100
  5. Hayes, N., ve Introna, L. D. (2005). Cultural values, plagiarism, and fairness: When plagiarism gets in the way of learning. Ethics & Behavior, 15(39, 213-231. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1503_2
  6. Henderson, T. (2011). The biggest misconceptions about plagiarism. http://www.sooperarticles.com/writing-articles/article-writing-articles/biggest-misconceptions-aboutplagiarism-276836.html adresinden erişildi.
  7. Kayaoğlu, M. N., Erbay, Ş., Flitner, C., ve Saltaş, D. (2016). Examining students’ perceptions of plagiarism: A cross-cultural study at tertiary level. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(5), 682-705. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2015.1014320
  8. Köklü, N. (2000). Lisans ve lisans üstü öğrencilerinin görüşlerine göre araştırma sürecine yönelik etik olmayan davranışların gösterilme sıklığı ve nedenleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 6(4), 527-542. http://kuey.net/index.php/kuey/article/view/577 adresinden erişildi.
  9. Leask, B. (2006). Plagiarism, cultural diversity and metaphor-implications for academic staff development. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(2), 183-199. doi: 10.1080/02602930500262486
  10. Mahmood, S. T., Mahmood, A., Khan, M. N. ve Malik, A. B. (2010). Intellectual property rights: Conceptual awareness of research students about plagiarism. International Journal of Academic Research, 2(6), Nowember, 193-198.
  11. Özenç Uçak, N. ve Ünal, Y. (2015). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Bölümü öğrencilerinin akademik sahtekârlık ve intihal konusundaki görüşleri. Prof. Dr. İrfan Çakın`a Armağan içinde (s. 251-264). Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Bölümü. http://www.bby.hacettepe.edu.tr/yayinlar/dosyalar/32-U%C3%A7ak-%C3%9Cnal-251-264.pdf adresinden erişildi.
  12. Sowden, C. (2005). Plagiarism and the culture of multilingual students in higher education abroad. ELT Journal, 59(3), 226-233. doi: 10.1093/elt/cci042
  13. Wilkinson, J. (2009). Staff and student perceptions of plagiarism and cheating. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 98-105. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ864328.pdf adresinden erişildi.
  14. Zimerman, M. (2012). Plagiarism and international students in academic libraries. New Library World, 113(5/6), 290-299. doi: 10.1108/03074801211226373

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Baysen, E., & Çakmak, N. (2017). Bilgi Dünyası ve İntihal. Bilgi Dünyası, 18(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2017.597