Öz

Proje Yönetimi (PY), çeşitli yazılım ve teknik araçlar aracılığıyla gerçekleştirilmelidir. Proje yönetimi yazılımları sayesinde iş akışını ve zamanlamayı takip etmek ve en iyi kararları vermek kolaylaşmaktadır. Proje yönetimi yazılımları her zaman kütüphanelerin geleneksel yöntemleriyle karşılaştırılmıştır. Bir kütüphane her zaman geleneksel proje yapma yöntemleri ile işleyişini sürdürmekteyse, PY yazılımı, kütüphanelerin planlanan projesine baştan sona sistematik stratejiler geliştirmesine yardımcı olur. Bu sebeple bu araştırmanın temel amacı, kütüphanelerde PY Yazılımı kullanmanın avantajları ve zorlukları hakkında sistematik literatür taraması gerçekleştirmektir. Araştırmada sistematik literatür tarama kontrol listelerinden biri olan Sistematik incelemeler ve Meta-Analizler için Tercih Edilen Raporlama Öğeleri (PRISMA) kullanılmıştır. Ebscohost, Emerald, Scopus, WOS ve ScienceDirect veri tabanlarının gelişmiş arama motorlarında (“Project Management” OR “Project Management Software” OR “PM”) ve (“library” OR “Libraries” OR “librarian”) terimleri aranmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen ana bulgu, kütüphanelerde proje yönetim yazılımı kullanımının birçok zorluklara rağmen planlamaya açıklık getirmesi, teknik araçlar ve yazılımlar kullanılarak planların ve sürecin iyi anlaşılması gibi birçok avantajının olmasıdır. Elde edilen diğer bir önemli sonuç ise, PY yazılımlarının baştan sona planlama sağladığı, üretkenliği ve başarıyı artırmak için sık yapılan değişikliklere kolayca uyarlanabilir olduğunun anlaşılmasıdır. Ayrıca, bu çalışma diğer çalışmalardan farklı olarak proje yönetimi yazılımları ile ilgili literatürdeki eksiklikleri de belirtmekte ve bu yönüyle araştırmacılara yol göstereceği umulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Proje yönetimi, kütüphane, yazılım, avantajlar, zorluklar, proje yönetimi yazılımı

Referanslar

  1. Ahmad, M. O., Markkula, J., & Oivo, M. (2013). Kanban in software development: A systematic literature review. 2013 39th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2013.28
  2. Aktoprak, A., & Hursen, C. (2022). A bibliometric and content analysis of critical thinking in primary education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101029
  3. Al-Dabbagh, A. (2005). Globalism and the universal language. English Today, 21(2), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078405002026
  4. Bjornen, K. K., & Ippoliti, C. (2022). Making it better: A project management framework for creating a research data services program. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 99. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2623
  5. Blythe, K., Solomon, J., & Gunther, W. K. (2019). The hard task of soft skills: project management for the materials review process. Serials Review, 45(3), 158-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2019.1647745
  6. Burress, T., & Rowell, C. J. (2017). Project management for digital projects with collaborators beyond the library. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 24(2-4), 300-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2017.1336954
  7. Chou, C., Shadle, S., & Teel, K. (2019). Cooperative cataloging projects: managing them for best results. The Serials Librarian, 76(1-4), 110-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2019.1535682
  8. Cobo Serrano, S., & Arquero Avilés, R. (2018). Project management techniques at the Complutense University: academic librarians’ perceptions. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 24(2), 124-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2017.1406378
  9. Collins, M., & Wilson, K. (2018). An agile approach to technical services. The Serials Librarian, 74(1-4), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2018.1443652
  10. D’Amato, K., & Erb, R. A. (2018). The road from millennium to alma: two tracks, one destination. The Serials Librarian, 74(1-4), 217-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2018.1428475
  11. Er-Koçoğlu, N. (2022). Kütüphanecilik ve bilgi bilimi alanında yayımlanan bilimsel makalelerde serbest erişimli bilgi kaynaklarının kapsamı. Bilgi Dünyası, 22(2), 329-349. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2021.641
  12. Guo, J. X. (2019). Measuring information system project success through a software-assisted qualitative content analysis. Information Technology and Libraries, 38(1), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v38i1.10603
  13. Harden, M., & Ajamie, L. (2020). Product ownership and the library website redesign process. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 27(2-4), 385-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2021.1892559
  14. Hartsell-Gundy, A., Lawton, K., & Rozear, H. (2020). 17 librarians and one big undertaking: creating a digital project from start to finish. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 32(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2019.1709730
  15. Henkoğlu, H. Ş. (2021). Türkiye’deki üniversite kütüphane web sitelerinin web içeriği erişilebilirlik kılavuzu kapsamında değerlendirilmesi. Bilgi Dünyası, 22(2), 251-288.
  16. Igbo, H., Ibegbulam, I., Asogwa, B., & Imo, N. (2022). Provision of digital information resources in Nigerian university libraries. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.47989/IRPAPER936
  17. Igwe, K. N., & Sulyman, A. S. (2022). Smart libraries: changing the paradigms of library services. Business Information Review, 39(4), 147-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/02663821221110042
  18. Kelly, M., & O’Gara, G. (2018). Collections assessment: developing sustainable programs and projects. The Serials Librarian, 74(1-4), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2018.1428453
  19. Kinkus, J. (2007). Project management skills: a literature review and content analysis of librarian position announcements. College & Research Libraries, 68(4), 352-363. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.68.4.352
  20. Kipps, K. L., & Jones, A. K. (2020). Things are looking up: using cloud-based technology tools in collection management workflows. Serials Review, 46(3), 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2020.1806646
  21. Koldunov, N. v., & Cristini, L. (2018). Programming as a soft skill for project managers: how to have a computer take over some of your work. Advances in Geosciences, 45, 295-303. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-45-295-2018
  22. Lacuata, A. N. (2020). Digitization of library resources in higher education ınstitutions in La Union, Philippines. Preservation, Digital Technology & Culture, 49(4), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2020-0031
  23. McGeary, B., Guder, C., & Ganeshan, A. (2021). Opening up educational practices through faculty, librarian, and student collaboration in OER creation: Moving from labor-intensive to supervisory ınvolvement. The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v16i1.6149
  24. McLean, J., & Canham, R. (2018). Managing the electronic resources lifecycle with kanban. Open Information Science, 2(1), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2018-0003
  25. Michalak, R., & Rysavy, M. D. T. (2020). Managing remote projects effectively with an action dashboard. Journal of Library Administration, 60(7), 800-811. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2020.1803022
  26. Miller, A. (2018). Innovative management strategies for building and sustaining a digital initiatives department with limited resources. Digital Library Perspectives, 34(2), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-08-2017-0029
  27. Mitchell, E. T. (2018). Lightweight tools and dashboards for program management in libraries. Technical Services Quarterly, 35(1), 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2017.1385295
  28. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339(jul21 1), b2535-b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
  29. Monnin, C. (2020). Asana (product review). Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.29173/jchla29509
  30. Nelson, G. M., Goates, M. C., Pixton, D. S., Frost, M., & Broadbent, D. (2020). Collection weeding: Innovative processes and tools to ease the burden. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(5), 102139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102139
  31. O’Hara, G., Lapworth, E., & Lampert, C. (2020). Cultivating digitization competencies. Information Technology and Libraries, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v39i4.11859
  32. Petters, J. L., Brooks, G. C., Smith, J. A., & Haas, C. A. (2019). The impact of targeted data management training for field research projects - a case study. Data Science Journal, 18. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-043
  33. Porter, S. (2019). Project management in higher education: a grounded theory case study. Library Management, 40(5), 338-352. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-06-2018-0050
  34. Potnis, D. D., & Gala, B. (2020). Managing the “backend” of LIS research projects: A project management perspective. Library & Information Science Research, 42(1), 100996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.100996
  35. Pryima, S. M., Anishchenko, O. V., Dayong, Y., & Ivanova, N. A. (2019). Formation of the project competence of future specialists in information, library and archive services in a digital society. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 70(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v70i2.2639
  36. Ratledge, D., & Sproles, C. (2017). An analysis of the changing role of systems librarians. Library Hi Tech, 35(2), 303-311. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-08-2016-0092
  37. Rojișteanu, C. E. (2017). Google me this: what can project management be for libraries in the age of Google et al.? Journal of Library and Information Science, 13(2), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.26660/rrbsi.2017.13.2.27
  38. Shein, C., Robinson, H. E., & Gutierrez, H. (2018). Agility in the archives: translating agile methods to archival project management. RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts, and Cultural Heritage, 19(2), 94. https://doi.org/10.5860/rbm.19.2.94
  39. Shelby, J. (2019). Convergent evolution of innovative teams in technical services. Serials Review, 45(3), 150-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2019.1644711
  40. Stoddard, M. M., Gillis, B., & Cohn, P. (2019). Agile project management in libraries: creating collaborative, resilient, responsive organizations. Journal of Library Administration, 59(5), 492-511. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2019.1616971
  41. Stojanovic, V. (2021). Trello (product review). Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.29173/jchla29545
  42. Sullo, E. (2017). Academic librarians at istitutions with LIS programs assert that project management training is valuable. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 12(3), 180. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8TM1S
  43. Systematic reviews. (2022). What is PRISMA? https://guelphhumber.libguides.com/c.php?g=213266&p=1406923#:~:text=What%20is%20PRISMA%3F,a%204-phase%20flow%20diagram
  44. Systematic reviews in health. (2023). University of Canberra. https://canberra.libguides.com/systematic/report
  45. Waterhouse, J., & Mann, S. (2021). Mapping domain knowledge for leading and managing change. The Serials Librarian, 80(1-4), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2021.1863140
  46. Wu, Y., Guimaraes, A., & Wang, Z. (John). (2020). Product owners at hesburgh libraries: increasing stakeholder engagement and accountability through continuous organizational enhancement. Journal of Library Administration, 60(7), 695-713. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2020.1797329
  47. Zvyagintseva, L. (2018). Community-led digital exhibits service at the edmonton public library: research and consultation. partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v12i2.3957

Lisans

Telif Hakkı (c) 2023 Yazar(lar). Açık erişimli bu makale, orijinal çalışmaya uygun şekilde atıfta bulunulması koşuluyla, herhangi bir ortamda veya formatta sınırsız kullanım, dağıtım ve çoğaltmaya izin veren Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) altında dağıtılmıştır.

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Özdamlı, F., Sultan, S., & Karanfiller, T. (2023). Kütüphanelerde Proje Yönetiminin Etkinliği: Sistematik Bir İnceleme. Bilgi Dünyası, 24(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2023.697