Abstract

Interdisciplinary efforts are becoming more critical for scientific discovery and translational research efforts. Highly integrated and interactive research teams share a number of features that contribute to their success in developing and sustaining their efforts over time. Through analysis of in-depth interviews with members of highly successful research teams and others who did not meet their goals or ended because of conflicts, we identified key elements that are critical for team success and effectiveness. There is no debate that the scientific goal sits at the center of the collaborative effort. However, supporting features need to be in place to avoid the derailment of the team. Among the most important of these is trust: without trust, the team dynamic runs the risk of deteriorating over time. Other critical factors of which both leaders and participants need to be aware include developing a shared vision, strategically identifying team members and purposefully building the team, promoting disagreement while containing conflict, and setting clear expectations for sharing credit and authorship. Self-awareness and strong communication skills contribute greatly to effective leadership and management strategies of scientific teams. While all successful teams share the characteristic of effectively carrying out these activities, there is no single formula for execution with every leader exemplifying different strengths and weaknesses. Successful scientific collaborations have strong leaders who are self-aware and are mindful of the many elements critical for supporting the science at the center of the effort.

Keywords: Collaboration, Trust, Translational research, Managing conflict, Promoting disagreement, Sharing credit

References

  1. Abraham, T. (2004). Twenty-first century plague: The story of SARS. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  2. Atkins, P. W. B. ve Wood, R. E. (2002). Self- versus others’ rating as predictors of assessment center ratings: Validation evidence for 360-degree feedback programs. Personnel Psychology, 55(4), 871-904.
  3. Bammer, G. (2008). Enhancing research collaborations: Three key management challenges. Research Policy, 37(5), 875-887.
  4. Benkler, Y. (2011). The unselfish gene. Harvard Business Review, 89, 76-85.
  5. Bennett, L. M. ve Gadlin, H. (2011). Collaborative agreement [Team Science and Collaboration Web site]. 25 Ekim 2011 tarihinde http://teamscience.nih.gov adresinden erişildi.
  6. Bennett, L. M., Gadlin, H. ve Levine-Findley, S. (2010). Team science and collaboration: A field guide. Bethesda, MD: Department of Health and Human Services.
  7. Burbules, N. C. ve Rice, S. (1991). Dialogue across differences: Continuing the conversation. Harvard Educational Review, 61(4), 393-416.
  8. Cech, T. R. ve Rubin, G. M. (2004). Nurturing interdisciplinary research. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 11, 1166-1169.
  9. Coller, B. S. (2008). Translational research: Forging a new cultural identity. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 75(5), 478-487.
  10. Coser, L. (1956). The functions of social conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  11. Curtin, C. (2008). Works well with others. Genome Technology, 36-42.
  12. Dirks, K. T. ve Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12(4), 450-467.
  13. Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  14. Kahneman, D. (2002). Autobiography [Nobel Prize Web Site]. 26 Ekim 2011 tarihinde http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/2002/kahneman.html adresinden erişildi.
  15. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697-720.
  16. Klein, J. T. (2010). Creating interdisciplinary campus cultures: A model for strength and sustainability. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  17. Kreimer, A. R., González, P., Katki, H. A., Porras, C., Schiffman, M., Rodriguez, A. C., … CVT Vaccine Group. (2011). Efficacy of a bivalent HPV 16/18 vaccine against anal HPV 16/18 infection among young women: A nested analysis within the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial. The Lancet Oncology, 12(9), 862-870.
  18. Lewicki, R. J. (2006). Trust and distrust. A. K. Schneider ve C. Honeyman (Ed.). The Negotiator’s Fieldbook içinde. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
  19. Mannix, E. ve Neale, M. A. (2005). What differences make a difference? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(2), 31-55.
  20. Myers, I. B. ve Myers, P. B. (1980). Gifts differing: Understanding personality type. Mountain View, CA: Davies-Black Publishing.
  21. NIH Common Fund [The NIH Web Site]. (2011). 25 Ekim 2011 tarihinde http://commonfund.nih.gov adresinden erişildi.
  22. Reina, D. S. ve Reina, M. L. (2001). Trust and betrayal in the workplace. San Francisco.
  23. Rock, D. (2008). SCARF: A brain-based model for collaborating with and influencing others. NeuroLeadership Journal, 1, 1-9.
  24. Shrum, W., Genuth, J. ve Chompalov, I. (2007). Structures of scientific collaboration. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.
  25. Thomas, K. W. ve Killman, R. (2002). Thomas-Kilmann conflict mode instrument. Mountain View, CA: CPP, Inc.
  26. Tuckman, B. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384-399.
  27. Weeks, W. B., Wallace, A. E. ve Kimberly, B. C. (2004). Changes in authorship patterns in prestigious US medical journals. Social Science & Medicine, 59(9), 1949-1954.
  28. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F. ve Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039.
  29. Zucker, D. (2012a). Developing your career in an age of team science. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 60(5), 779-784.
  30. Zucker, D. (2012b). Tools for productively managing conflict. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 60(5), 776-778.

How to cite

Bennett, L. M., & Gadlin, H. (2013). Collaboration and Team Science: From Theory to Practice (L. Ataseven & R. Yılmaz, Trans.). Information World, 14(2), 420-439. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2013.131