Abstract

In this paper, research methods used in social sciences. Especially in librarianship are examined. Qualitative and quantitative research methods are compared. Differences between the two approaches are pointed out along with the strenghts and weaknesses of each methodology. The characteristics of qualitative research methods are examined in detail. Major content analysis studies that evaluate the use of both quantitative and qualitative research methods in Turkish librarianship are summarized.

Keywords: Research methods in social sciences, Qualitative research methods in social sciences and librarianship

References

  1. Altınörs, G. (1983). Türkiye’de kütüphanecilik bilim dalı konusunda yapılmış olan doçentlik, doktora ve bilim uzmanlığı tezlerinde kullanılmış olan araştırma metodları. Yayınlanmamış Bilim Uzmanlığı Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  2. Bogdan, R. C. ve Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  3. Bradley, J. (1993). Methodological issues and practices in qualitative research. Library Quarterly, 63(4), 431-449.
  4. Busha, C. ve Harter, S. P. (1980). Research methods in librarianship: Techniques and interpretation. New York: Academic Press.
  5. Çakın, Y. (1980). Türk Kütüphaneciler Derneği Bülteni’nin içerik ve yazarlar yönünden değerlendirilmesi. Yayınlanmamış Bilim Uzmanlığı Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  6. Dervin, B. ve Nilan, M. (1986). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21, 3-33.
  7. Ellis, D. (1993). Modeling the information-seeking patterns of academic researchers: A grounded theory approach. Library Quarterly, 63(4), 469-486.
  8. Güvenç, B. (1996). Türkiye’de sosyal bilimler, gelişmeler ve süreklilikler. Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de Bilim, Etik ve Üniversite içinde (s. 23-35). Ankara: TUBA.
  9. İnam, A. (1996). Çağdaş bilim kavramı. Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de Bilim, Etik ve Üniversite içinde (s. 7-11). Ankara: TUBA.
  10. Jupp, V. ve Norris, C. (1993). Social research: Philosophy, politics and practice. London: Sage Publications.
  11. Kurbanoğlu, S. S. (1996). Kütüphanecilik ve bilgi bilim tezlerinde kullanılan bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri: Bir değerlendirme. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 10(4), 350-359.
  12. Marshall, C. ve Rossman, G. B. (1989). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
  13. Neuman, W. L. (1991). Social research methods. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  14. Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. London: Sage Publications.
  15. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation research methods. (2. baskı). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
  16. Reneker, M. H. (1993). A qualitative study of information seeking among members of an academic community: Methodological issues and problems. Library Quarterly, 63(4), 487-507.
  17. Rothery, M., Tutty, L. M. ve Grinnel, R. M. (1996). Qualitative research for social workers. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  18. Sandstrom, P. E. (1994). An optimal foraging approach to information seeking and use. Library Quarterly, 64(4), 414-449.
  19. Strauss, A. ve Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.
  20. Strauss, A. ve Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage Publications.
  21. Sutton, B. (1998). Qualitative research methods in library and information science. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science içinde (Vol. 62, Supp. 25, s. 264-278). New York: Marcel Dekker.
  22. Weingand, D. E. (1993). Grounded theory and qualitative methodology. IFLA Journal, 19(1), 17-26.
  23. Wilson, T. (1981). User studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 37(1), 3-15.
  24. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (1999). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  25. Yontar, A. (1998). Türkiye’de kütüphane ve bilgi bilimi konusundaki başlıca araştırma sorunlarının lisansüstü tezlerde yansıması. İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Kütüphanecilik Dergisi Belge Bilgi Kütüphane Araştırmaları, 4, 1-17.
  26. Yontar, A. ve Yalvaç, M. (2000). Problems of library and information science research in Turkey: A content analysis of journal articles (1952-1994). IFLA Journal, 26(1), 39-46.

License

Copyright (c) 2000 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to Cite

Özenç Uçak, N. (2000). Use of Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences and Librarianship. Information World, 1(2), 255-279. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2000.421