Abstract
Types of information resources were somewhat limited up until the last two decades. Researchers primarily used printed materials such as books, journals and reports. Along with the development of information technologies, the types of information resources have also proliferated. Elecrronic intormation resources in the form of CDROMs, electronic books, electronic joumals and web sites have become an indispensable part of not only our daily lives, but also of academic life. Different style books (APA, MLA, ete.) offer different solutions as to how to cite electronic information resources in research reports. This paper summarizes the main points of citing electronic information resources by making use of the American Psychological Association (APA) publication style.
Keywords: Bibliographical citations, Citations of electronic information resources
References
- Carbone, N. (t.y.). Citing electronic sources. [<;evrimir;:i]. Elektronik adres: http://www.marlboro.edu/home/CitingElectronicSources.html (27 Eylul 2000].
- Gates, B. {1999). Dijital sinir sistemiyle dil§Once htzmda 9alt§mak. (<;ev. Ali Cevat Akkoyunlu). istanbul: Dogan Kitapr;:1hk.
- Guernsey, L. (1996, Ocak 12). Cyberspace citations scholars debate how best to cite research conducted on line. The Chronicle of Higher Education, s. A18.
- Kennedy, A.J. (1999). The Internet: The rough guide (4th ed.). New York: Rough Guides Ltd.
- Li, X. ve Crane, N.B. (1996). Electronic styles: a handbook for citing electronic information (2nd ed.). Medford, N.J: Information Today, Inc.
- Page, M.E. (1996, $ubat 20). A brief citation guide for Internet sources in history and the humanities. H-AFRICA Humanities On-Line [<;evrimir;:i]. Elektronik adres: http://www2.h-net.msu.edu/~africa/citation.html [19 Eylul 2000].
License
Copyright (c) 2000 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

