Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to measure the information literacy skills and awareness of the first-year students studying at Çankırı Karatekin University Turkish Language and Literature Department. The sample of the study conducted in this context consists of 79 students from the Turkish Language and Literature Department of Çankırı Karatekin University in total. Before the study, in order to check the students’ prior knowledge, the information literacy scale pre-test was applied and it was determined that the prior knowledge of the groups was equivalent. In this study, in which the experimental design method was applied, the control group was lectured by the traditional method, while the experimental group was taught integrated with information literacy, and the results obtained from the pre and post-tests of the control and experimental groups were compared. In addition, within the scope of the study, after a 120-minute lecture was given to both control and experimental groups, a research performance task was assigned, and written performance tasks were collected. The research performance tasks prepared by the students were evaluated based on the rubric prepared by the researchers according to the basics of information literacy. As a result of the study, it was determined that information literacy education did not develop the expected competence on the basis of the performance task in the experimental group, but there was a statistically positive significant difference between the pretest and post-test scores of the experimental group, and thus the awareness of the students about information literacy increased. However, although the control group students got higher scores than the experimental group students on the basis of the performance task, it was found that there was no statistically significant difference between the pre-test scores and the post-test scores after the training. As a result of the study, it was concluded that the 120 minutes of education integrated with information literacy increased students’ awareness on this issue, but it was insufficient in developing information literacy skills. Spreading the information literacy integrated course education to a wider time, supported with practice, homework and different methods is suggested.

Keywords: Information literacy skills, performance assignment, Çankırı Karatekin University, Department of Turkish Language and Literature

References

  1. Adıgüzel, A. (2011). Bilgi okuryazarlığı ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (17), 15-28. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/zgefd/issue/47948/606648
  2. Ajiboye, O. O. ve Tiamiyu, M. A. (2018). Effectiveness assessment of an information literacy course at the University of Ilorin, Nigeria. Journal of Information Science, Systems and Technology, 2(1), 19-33. http://arcis.ui.edu.ng/jisst/upload/JISST-2[1]-AJIBOYE%20&%20%20%20TIAMIYU FINAL-FORMATTED-Effectiveness%20Assessment%20of%20an%20Information%20%20Literacy%20%20Course%20at%20the%20University%20of%20Ilorin,%20Nigeria.pdf
  3. American Association of School Librarians/Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (1998). Information literacy standarts for student learning: Standarts and Indicators. https://www.ala.org/ala/aasl/aaslproftools/informationpower/InformationLiteracyStandards_final.pdf
  4. American College and Research Libraries. (2000). Information literacy competency standarts for higher education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency
  5. American College and Research Libraries. (2016). Framework for information literacy for higher education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/files/issues/infolit/framework.pdf
  6. American Library Association. (1989). Presidential committee on information literacy: Final report. http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential
  7. Brettle, A. ve Raynor, M. (2013). Developing information literacy skills in pre-registration nurses: an experimental study of teaching methods. Nurse Education Today, 33(2), 103-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.12.003
  8. Bruce, C. S. (1994). Information literacy blueprint. https://www.academia.edu/2463291/Information_literacy_blueprint
  9. Burchinal, L. G. (1976). The communications revolution: America’s third century challenge. https://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/drew.whitworth/burchinal.html
  10. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Deneysel desenler öntest-sontest kontrol grubu desen ve veri analizi. Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  11. Doyle, C. S. (1992). Outcome measures for information literacy within the National Educational Goals of 1990: Final report to National Forum on Information Literacy: Summary of findings. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED351033
  12. Fitzpatrick, M. J. ve Meulemans, Y. N. (2011). Assessing an information literacy assignment and workshop using a quasi-experimental design. College Teaching, 59(4), 142-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2011.591452
  13. Kuhlthau, C. C. (1987). Information skills for an information society: A review of research. An ERIC information analysis product. ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED297740.pdf
  14. Kurbanoğlu, S. (2010). Bilgi okuryazarlığı: Kavramsal bir analiz. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 24(4), 723-747. http://www.tk.org.tr/index.php/TK/article/viewFile/447/437
  15. Leckie, G. J. ve Fullerton, A. (1999). Information literacy in science and engineering undergraduate education: Faculty attitudes and pedagogical practices. College & Research Libraries, 60(1), 9-29. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.60.1.9
  16. Liu, K., Lian, A. ve Yodkamlue, B. (2021). Integrating Information Literacy Training in an English Speaking Course in the Chinese Context. P. V. P. Ho ve diğerleri (Yay. haz.). 17th International Conference of the Asia Association of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (AsiaCALL 2021) içinde (ss. 29-39). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210226.004
  17. Maitaouthong, T., Tuamsuk, K. ve Techamanee, Y. (2011). Development of the instructional model by integrating information literacy in the class learning and teaching processes. Education for information, 28(2-4), 137-150. https://content.iospress.com/articles/education-for-information/efi00897
  18. Matlin, T. T. ve Lantzy, T. P. (2017). Maintaining quality while expanding our reach: Using online information literacy tutorials in the sciences and health sciences. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 12(3), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8ZD3Q
  19. Mesleki Yeterlilik Kurumu. (2018). 2018’de Güncellenen Anahtar Yetkinlikler Hakkındaki Tavsiye Kararı’nın Türkçe tercümesi yayımlandı. https://www.myk.gov.tr/index.php/tr/haberler/102tuerkiye-yeterlilikle-cercevesi-dairesi-bakanl/3666-2018de-guencellenen-anahtar yetkinlikler-hakkndaki-tavsiye-kararnn-tuerkce-tercuemesi-yaymland
  20. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2017). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı ilköğretim ve orta öğretim programlarının güncellenmesi. https://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_01/13152934_basYn_aYklamasY_13012017.pdf
  21. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (t.y.). Öğretim programlarını izleme ve değerlendirme sistemi: Öğretim programları. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Programlar.aspx
  22. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Eğitim Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dairesi Başkanlığı (2011). MEB 21. yüzyıl öğrenci profili. https://www.meb.gov.tr/earged/earged/21.%20yy_og_pro.pdf
  23. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı. (2017). Müfredat yenileme ve değişiklik çalışmalarımız üzerine… Ankara, 18 Temmuz 2017. https://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_07/18160003_basin_aciklamasi-program.pdf
  24. Oakleaf, M. (2009). The information literacy instruction assessment cycle: A guide for increasing student learning and improving librarian instructional skills. Journal of Documentation, 65(4), 539-560. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410910970249
  25. Özdemir, Ş. ve Gülseçen, S. (2015). Aşırı bilgi artışının bilgiye erişim sürecindeki etkileri: İstanbul üniversitesi enformatik bölümü örneği. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 4(3), 334-344. http://www.jret.org/FileUpload/ks281142/File/37.sebnem_ozdemir.pdf
  26. Özgüven, Ü. (2019). Öğrencilerin bilgi okuryazarlığı becerilerini geliştirmede kullanıcı eğitiminin rolü: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi örneği. [Yüksek lisans tezi]. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi. https://acikerisim.bartin.edu.tr/handle/11772/1972
  27. Öztürk, D. ve Güdek, B. (2016). Viyolonsel performans değerlendirmesine yönelik dereceli puanlama anahtarının (Rubrik) geliştirilmesi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Akademik Müzik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(3), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.5578/amrj.10447
  28. Polat, C. ve Odabaş, H. (2008). Bilgi toplumunda yaşam boyu öğrenmenin anahtarı: Bilgi okuryazarlığı. Küreselleşme, Demokratikleşme ve Türkiye Uluslararası Sempozyumu Bildiri Kitabı, 27-30 Mart 2008, Antalya içinde (ss. 596-606). Akdeniz Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi. http://eprints.rclis.org/12661/
  29. Türkiye Yükseköğretim Yeterlilikler Çerçevesi. (2010). Türkiye yükseköğretim yeterlilikleri çerçevesi (TYYÇ) 6. Düzey (lisans eğitimi) yeterlilikleri. http://tyyc.yok.gov.tr/?pid=33#
  30. Warmkessel, M. M. ve McCade, J. M. (1997). Integrating information literacy into the curriculum. Research Strategies, 15(2), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-3310(97)90024-0
  31. Williams, M. H. ve Evans, J. J. (2008). Factors in information literacy education. Journal of Political Science Education, 4(1), 116-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512160701816234
  32. Yıldırım, Z. (2016). Selçuk Üniversitesi öğrencilerinin bilgi okuryazarlığı becerileri. Karatekin Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(2), 133-153. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/karefad/issue/40189/478478
  33. Zurkowski, P. G. (1974). The information service environment: Relationships and priorities. Related Paper No. 5. (Report ED 100391). National Commission on Libraries and Information Science. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED100391.pdf

How to Cite

Mandıracı, T., & Zan, B. U. (2021). Assessment of Student’s Information Retrieval and Using Skills: Çankırı Karatekin University Example. Information World, 22(1), 131-159. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2021.560