Öz

Bu çalışmada mimarlık öğrencilerinin intihale ilişkin tutumlarının ortaya çıkarılması hedeflenmiştir. Çalışma enine kesit araştırması desenine göre uyarlanmıştır. Çalışma, Mimarlık Fakültesi, Mimarlık Bölümü öğrencileriyle (n=233) gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler, öğrencilerin “İntihale Karşı Tutum Ölçeği”ne verdikleri yanıtlardan elde edilmiştir. Verilerin çözümlenmesinde SPSS istatistik programı kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizi sonucunda öğrencilerin ölçeğin Olumlu, Olumsuz ve Bireysel Değerler boyutlarının üçüne ait orta düzeyde tutuma sahip oldukları tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, öğrencilerin intihale ilişkin bilgileri yetersiz düzeyde çıkmıştır. Analiz sonucunda ortaya çıkan diğer önemli sonuçlar da şu şekildedir: Öğrenciler intihalin iyi bir davranış olmadığına inanmalarına rağmen, toplumsal hale gelmiş önemli bir sorun olduğunu düşünmektedirler. İntihal davranışı sergileyip sergilememe şartlara bağlıdır. Yöntembilimsel terimler ve zaman sınırlaması intihal davranışının önde gelen nedenleridir. İntihal, uzmanları ilgilendiren bir meseledir ve öğrenciler özellikle de atıf yapmaksızın eski çalışmalarını kullanmaları durumunda cezalandırılmamalıdırlar. Elde edilen verilere göre, kızlar erkeklere nazaran konuya daha hassas yaklaşmaktadırlar. Ayrıca, intihale ilişkin tutumlar sınıf düzeyi arttıkça daha olumluya doğru değişmektedir. Çalışma sonunda, kütüphanecilere, eğitimcilere ve politika geliştiricilere öneriler getirilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler: İntihal, tutum, mimarlık, mimarlık öğrencileri

Referanslar

  1. Ahmad, U. K, Mansourizadeh, K., & Ai, G. K. M. (2012). Non-native university students’ perception of plagiarism. Advances in Language and Litrarcy Studies, 3 (1), 39-48. doi: 10.7575/aiac.alls.v.3n.1p.39
  2. Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality and behavior (2nd ed.). England, New York: Open University Press Maidenhead.
  3. Akpınar Dellal, N., Yönet, H., & Akın, E. B. (2017). Üniversite kimliği ve akademik sahtekârlık: Yabancı dil öğretmen adaylarının akademik sahtekârlığa ilişkin tutumları. In N. Akpınar Dellal & M. V. Coşkun (Eds.), Bilimde etik ve demokratik eğitim (Ethics in science and democratic education) (pp.79-94). Turkey: Lambert Academic Publishing, Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323727579_Universite_Kimligi_ve_Akademik_Sahtekarlik_Yabanci_Dil_Ogretmen_Adaylarinin_Akademik_Sahtekarliga_Iliskin_Tutumlari
  4. Allmer, A. (2016). Meslek etiği: Öğrenci yarışmalarında ödül iptalleri, intihal ve etik. Mimarlık, 389, May-June. Retrieved from http://www.mo.org.tr/mimarlikdergisi/
  5. Auer, J., & Krupar, E. M. (2001). Mouse click plagiarism: The role of technology in plagiarism and the librarian’s role in combating it. Library Trends, 49(3), 415-432. Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/8353/librarytrendsv49i3d_opt.pdf
  6. Badea-Voiculescu, O. (2013). Attitude of Romanian medicine students towards plagiarism. Romanian Journal of Morphology & Embryology, 54(3 Suppl), 907-908. Retrieved from http://www.rjme.ro/RJME/resources/files/541313907908.pdf
  7. Barnhardt, B. (2016). The “epidemic” of cheating depends on its definition: A critique of inferring the moral quality of “cheating in any form”. Ethics & Behavior, 26(4), 330-343. doi:10.1080/10508422.2015.1026595
  8. Bašić, Z., Kružić, I., Jerković, I., Buljan, I. & Marušić, A. (2018). Attitudes and knowledge about plagiarism among university students: Cross sectional survey at the University of Split, Croatia. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1-17. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948018-0073-x
  9. Baysen, E., Hoškova-Mayerova, Š., Çakmak, N., & Baysen, F. (2017a). Misconceptions of Czech and Turkish university students in providing citations. In A. Maturo, Š. Hoškova-Mayerova, D.-T. Soitu, & J. Kacprzyk (Series Eds.), Studies in Systems, Decision and Control Series: Vol. 66 Recent trends in social systems: Quantitative theories and quantitative models (pp. 183-190). Switzerland: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-40585-8_16
  10. Baysen, E., Hošková-Mayerová, Š., Çakmak, N., & Baysen, F. (2017b). Misconceptions regarding providing citations: To neglect means to take risk for future scientific research. In Š. Hošková Mayerová, F. Maturo, & J. Kacprzyk (Series Eds.), Studies in Systems, Decision and Control Series: Vol. 104 Mathematical-statistical models and qualitative theories for economic and social sciences (pp. 177-186). Switzerland: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-54819-7_12
  11. Camara, S. K., Eng-Ziskin, S., Wimberley, L., Dabbour, K. S., & Lee, A. M. (2017). Predicting students’ intention to plagiarize: An ethical theoretical framework. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(1), 43-58. doi: 10.1007/s10805-016-9269-3
  12. Carter, D. (2018, March 19), How can designers deal with plagiarism [blog]. Retrieved from https://www.creativebloq.com/features/how-can-designers-deal-with-plagiarism
  13. Cleary, M. N. (2017, November 27). Top 10 reasons students plagiarize & what teachers can do about it (with apologies to David Letterman). Phi Delta Kappan, 99 (4), 66-71. Retrieved from http://www.kappanonline.org/cleary-top-10-reasons-students-plagiarize/
  14. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th. ed.). Thousand Oaks ve London: Sage Publications.
  15. Çakmak, N. (2015). Lisans öğrencilerinin intihal ile ilgili kavram yanılgıları [Undergraduates’ Misconceptions Concerning Plagiarism]. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 29(2), 212–240. Retrieved from http://www.tk.org.tr
  16. Çakmak, N. (2016). Lisans öğrencilerinin bilgi arama süreçleri ile ilgili kavramları, tutumları ve düşünceleri [Undergraduate students’ concepts, attitudes and thoughts regarding information search process] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  17. Çakmak, N., & Baysen, E. (2017). Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Bölümü öğrencilerinin bilgi arama süreci deneyimleri: Kavram yanılgıları [Department of Information and Records Management students’ information search process experiences: Misconceptions]. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 31(3), 305-333. doi: 10.24146/tkd.2017.17
  18. Ehrich, J., Howard, S., Mu, C., & Bokosmaty, S. (2016). A comparison of Chinese and Australian university students’ attitudes towards plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 41(2), 231-246. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.927850
  19. Ehrich, J., Howard, S., Tognolini, J., & Bokosmaty, S. (2015). Measuring attitudes toward plagiarism: Issues and psychometric solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 7(2), 243-257. doi: 10.1108/JARHE-02-2014-0013
  20. Ejezi, K. E. (2015). Ethical perspectives on implementation of computer aided design curriculum in architecture in Nigeria: A case study of Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Uli. International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation, 9(12), 4198-4203. Retrieved from http://www.waset.org/publications/10003076
  21. Eminoğlu, E., & Nartgün, Z. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin akademik sahtekarlık eğilimlerinin ölçülmesine yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması [A scale development study to measure academic dishonesty tendency of university students]. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(1), 215-240. Retrieved from http://www.insanbilimleri.com
  22. Er, K. O., & Gürgan, U. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının öz-yeterlik algıları ve kopya çekmeye ilişkin tutumları arasındaki ilişki. Balikesir University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 14(26), 1-18. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=90c35d08-347d48b6-ad4b-7aefeca2eb58%40sdc-v-sessmgr05&bdata=Jmxhbmc9dHImc2l0ZT1lZHMtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=78004670&db=a9h
  23. Eweda, N. H. (2011). Intellectual property in architecture: Between legislations and ethical manifestations with special reference to the Egyptian case. Archnet-IJAR, International Journal of Architectural Research, 5(3), 93-106. doi: 10.26687/archnet-ijar.v5i3.209
  24. Ewing, H., Mathieson, K., Anast, A., & Roehling, T. (2017). Student and faculty perceptions of plagiarism in health sciences education. Journal of Further and Higher Education. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2017.1356913
  25. Franzoi, S. L. (2006). Social psychology (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  26. Garrett, L., & Robinson, A. (2012, July). Spot the Difference! Visual plagiarism in the visual arts. EVA London, Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA) Conference. Retrieved from http://www.research.ucreative.ac.uk/1194/1/ewic_ev12_s2paper1.pdf
  27. George, S., Costigan, A., & O’hara, M. (2013). Placing the library at the heart of plagiarism prevention: The University of Bradford experience. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 19(2), 141-160. doi: 10.1080/13614533.2013.800756
  28. Ghajarzadeh, M., Norouzi-Javidan, A., Hassanpour, K., Aramesh, K., & Emami-Razavi, S. H. (2012). Attitude toward plagiarism among Iranian medical faculty members. Acta Medica Iranica, 50(11), 778-781. Retrieved from http://acta.tums.ac.ir/index.php/acta
  29. Gibson, N. S., & Chester-Fangman, C. (2011). The librarian’s role in combating plagiarism. Reference Services Review, 39(1), 132-150. doi: 10.1108/00907321111108169
  30. Gottardello, D., Pàmies, M. del M., & Valverde, A. M. (2017). Professors’ perceptions of university students’ plagiarism: A literature review. BiD: Textos Universitaris de Biblioteconomia i Documentació, 39. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1344/BiD2017.39.12
  31. Graves, S. M. (2008). Student cheating habits: A predictor of workplace deviance. Journal of Diversity Management-First Quarter, 3(1), 14-22. Retrieved from http://clutejournals.com/index.php/JDM/article/view/4977
  32. Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. A. (2010). Exploring university students’ perceptions of plagiarism: A focus group study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 463-481. doi: 10.1080/03075070903096508
  33. Gunnarsson, J., Kulesza, W. J., & Petterson, A. (2014). Teaching international students how to avoid plagiarism: Librarians and faculty in collaboration. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(3 4), 413 417. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.04.006
  34. Henderson, T. (2011). The biggest misconceptions about plagiarism. Retrieved from http://www.sooperarticles.com/writing-articles/article-writing-articles/biggestmisconceptions-aboutplagiarism-276836.html
  35. Hue, H. T., Thom, N. T., & Le, T. T. N. (2018). Factors that influence on students’ attitudes towards plagiarism: The case of Vietnam. In 9th International Conference on Socio-Economic and Environmental Issues in Development, 11-12 May 2018 (pp. 552-563). Labours: Social Publishing House.
  36. Hollins, T. J., Lange, N., Dennis, I., & Longmore, C. A. (2016). Social influences on unconscious plagiarism and anti-plagiarism. Memory, 24(7), 884-902. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1059857
  37. Howard, S. J., Ehrich, J. F., & Walton, R. (2014). Measuring students’ perceptions of plagiarism: Modification and Rasch validation of a plagiarism attitude scale. Journal of Applied Measurement, 15 (4), 372-393. Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/sspapers/1461/
  38. Jensen, L. A., Arnett, J. J., Feldman, S. S., & Cauffman, E. (2002). It’s wrong, but everybody does it: Academic dishonesty among high school and college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 209-228. doi: 10.1006/ceps.2001.1088
  39. Kayaoğlu, M. N., Erbay, Ş., Flitner, C., & Saltaş, D. (2016). Examining students’ perceptions of plagiarism: A cross-cultural study at tertiary level. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(5), 682-705. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2015.1014320
  40. Kirthi, B., Pratap, K., Padma, T. M., & Kalyan, V. S. (2015). Attitudes towards plagiarism among post graduate students and faculty members of a teaching health care institution in Telangana: A cross-sectional questionnaire based study. International Journal of Advanced Research, 3(8), 1257-1263. Retrieved from http://www.journalijar.com/
  41. Kurbanoğlu, S. S. (2004). Kaynak gösterme el kitabı. Ankara: ÜNAK
  42. Leask, B. (2006). Plagiarism, cultural diversity and metaphor-implications for academic staff development. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(2), 183-199. doi: 10.1080/02602930500262486
  43. Liu, X., Liu, S., Lee, S.-h., & Magjuka, R. J. (2010). Cultural differences in online learning: International student perceptions. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 177–188. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.13.3.177?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
  44. Ma, R., & Qin, X. (2017). Individual factors influencing citation competence in L2 academic writing. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 24(2-3), 213-240. doi:10.1080/09296174.2016.1265793
  45. Mavrinac, M., Brumini, G., Bilić-Zulle, L., & Petrovečki, M. (2010). Construction and validation of attitudes toward plagiarism questionnaire. Croatian Medical Journal, 51(3), 195-201. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2010.51.195
  46. Mostafa, M. (2011). Inspiration versus Plagiarism: Academic integrity in architectuural education. International Journal of the Construction Education, 1(3), 85-99.
  47. Mullin, J. A. (2009). Appropriation, homage, and pastiche: Using artistic tradition to reconsider and redefine plagiarism. In C. P. Haviland & J. A. Mullin (Eds.), Who owns this text? Plagiarism, Authorship, and Disciplinary Cultures (pp. 105-128). Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1025&context=usupress_pubs
  48. Naveen, N., Raveendran, N., Vanishree, N., Prasad, K., Narayan, R. R., & Vignesh, D. (2017). An effectual analytics and cross sectional study on plagiarism among dental post graduates of Bangalore city. International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences, 3(3), 23-26. Retrieved from http://www.oraljournal.com/
  49. Obeid, R., & Hill, D. B. (2017). An Intervention designed to reduce plagiarism in a research methods classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 44(2), 155-159. doi: 10.1177/0098628317692620
  50. Olson, M. A., & Kendrick, R. V. (2008). Origins of attitudes. In W. D. Crano & R. Prislin (Eds.), Attitudes and Attitude Change (pp. 111-130). New York: Taylor & Francis.
  51. Opar B., & Havens, B. (2013, Nowember 11). Plagiarism by design. Retrieved from http://www.acsaarch.org/acsa-news/read/read-more/acsa-news/2013/11/11/plagiarism-by-design
  52. Quartuccio, K. (2014). Positive and negative attitudes and subjective norms toward plagiarism of RN to BSN students in an accelerated online program (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Case Western Reserve University, Ohio.
  53. Öymen Gür, Ş. (2007). Mimarlıkta taklit: Eski türkü-yeni Aranjman. Mimarlık, 333, 37-40. Retrieved from http://www.mo.org.tr/mimarlikdergisi/
  54. Özbek, O., & Çeyiz, S. (2017). University students’ opinions on cheating and plagiarism. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(8), 323-335. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.832326
  55. Özenç Uçak, N., & Ünal, Y. (2015). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Bölümü öğrencilerinin akademik sahtekârlık ve intihal konusundaki görüşleri. In Prof. Dr. İrfan Çakın`a Armağan (pp. 251-264). Ankara: Hacettepe Universitesi. Retrieved from http://www.bby.hacettepe.edu.tr/yayinlar/dosyalar/32-U%C3%A7ak-%C3%9Cnal-251-264.pdf
  56. Plagiarism. (2018). University of Oxford. Retrieved from https://www.ox.ac.uk/students/academic/guidance/skills/plagiarism?wssl=1#
  57. Polat, M. (2017). Türkiye’de öğrenciler neden kopya çeker? Bir meta‐sentez çalışması. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(1), 223‐242. Retrieved from http://ebad-jesr.com
  58. Poorolajal, J., Cheraghi, P., Doosti Irani, A., Cheraghi, Z., & Mirfakhraei, M. (2012). Construction of knowledge, attitude and practice questionnaire for assessing plagiarism. Iranian Journal Public Health, 41(11), 54-58. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3521886/
  59. Porter, M. (2010). A consideration of academic misconduct in the creative disciplines: From inspiration to imitation and acceptable incorporation. EMERGE, 2, 1-16. Retrieved from http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/12099/
  60. Pupovac, V., Bilic-Zulle, L., Mavrinac, M., & Petrovecki, M. (2010). Attitudes toward plagiarism among pharmacy and medical biochemistry students-cross-sectional survey study. Biochemia Medica, 20(3), 307-313. Rerieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/59293
  61. Pupovac, V., Bilic-Zulle, L., & Petrovecki, M. (2008). On academic plagiarism in Europe. An analytical approach based on four studies. Digithum, 10, 13-18. doi: 10.7238/d.v0i10.507
  62. Quah, C. H., Stewart, N., & Lee, J. W. C. (2012). Attitudes o business students’ toward plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(3), 185-199. doi: 10.1007/s10805-012-9157-4
  63. Rathore, F. A., Fatima, N. E., Farooq, F., & Mansoor, S. N. (2018). Combating scientific misconduct: The role of focused workshops in changing attitudes towards plagiarism. Cureus, 10(5). e2698. Doi:10.7759/cureus.2698
  64. Rathore, F. A., Waqas, A., Zia, A. M., Mavrinac, M., & Farooq, F. (2015). Exploring the attitudes of medical faculty members and students in Pakistan towards plagiarism: A cross sectional survey. PeerJ, 1-12. doi: I 10.7717/peerj.1031
  65. Rimmer, M. (2002). Crystal palaces: Copyright law and public architecture. Bond Law Review, 14(2), 320-346. Retrieved from http://’epublications.bond.edu.au/blr/vo114/iss2/4
  66. Rocher, A. R. (2018). Active learning strategies and academic self-efficacy relate to both attentional control and attitudes towards plagiarism. Active Learning in Higher Education, 1-14. doi: 10.1177/1469787418765515
  67. Schmelkin, L. P., Gilbert, K. A., & Silva, R. (2010). Multidimensional scaling of high school students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty. The High School Journal, 93(4), 156-165. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&sid=1c5066de-a0bc-4d7785ce-ac1a8d4f0976%40sdc-v-sessmgr05
  68. Songsriwittaya, A., Kongsuwan, S., Jitgarun, K., Kaewkuekool, S., & Koul, R. (2009). Engineering students’ attitude towards plagiarism: A survey study. Paper presented at the Procedings of The ICEE & ICEER 2009 Korea: International Conference on Engineering Education & Reseacrh. Retrieved from http://www.ineer.org/
  69. Šprajc, P., Urh, M., Jerebic, J., Trivan, D., & Jereb, E. (2017). Reasons for plagiarism in higher education. Organizacija, 50(1), 33-45. doi: 10.1515/orga-2017-0002
  70. Starovoytova, D., & Namango, S. S. (2016). Viewpoint of undergaruade engineering students on plagiarism. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(31), 48-65. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1122526
  71. Sureda-Negre, J., Comas, R., & Oliver-Trobat, M. F. (2015). Academic plagiarism among secondary and high school students: Differences in gender and procrastination. Comunicar, English ed., 22(44), 103-111. doi: 10.3916/C44-2015-11
  72. Suter, W. N., & Suter, P. M. (2018). Understanding plagiarism. Home Health Care Management & Practice, 30(4), 151-154. doi: 10.1177/1084822318779582
  73. Ural, M. N., & Sulak, S. A. (2012). Plagiarism via internet on undergraduate students in Turkey. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 2(3), 229-234. Retrieved from http://www.wjeis.org/
  74. Valentine, K. (2006). Plagiarism as literacy practice: Recognizing and rethinking ethical binaries. College Composition and Communication, 58(1), 89-109. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20456924
  75. Walcott, P. (2016). Attitudes of second year computer science undergraduates toward plagiarism. The Caribbean Teaching Scholar, 6, 63-80. Retrieved from https://journals.sta.uwi.edu/cts/index.asp
  76. What about images, videos, and music? (2017, May 18). Plagiarism.org. Retrieved from https://www.plagiarism.org/article/what-is-plagiarism
  77. What is plagiarism. (2017, May 18). Plagiarism.org. Retrieved from https://www.plagiarism.org/article/what-is-plagiarism

Lisans

Telif Hakkı (c) 2018 Yazar(lar). Açık erişimli bu makale, orijinal çalışmaya uygun şekilde atıfta bulunulması koşuluyla, herhangi bir ortamda veya formatta sınırsız kullanım, dağıtım ve çoğaltmaya izin veren Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) altında dağıtılmıştır.

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Baysen, F., Çakmak, N., & Özsavaş Akçay, A. (2018). Mimarlık Öğrencilerinin İntihale Karşı Tutumları. Bilgi Dünyası, 19(2), 231-253. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2018.719