Abstract

This study is a descriptive one that aims to measure and evaluate the web site usability of Aydın Adnan Menderes University Library. The participants of the study consist of 14 undergraduate students that are selected by convenience sampling method, studying at Aydın Adnan Menderes University and volunteer to participate in the study. For the purposes of this study, which combining qualitative and quantitative approaches together, data were collected through usability testing, questionnaire, observation and think aloud process. During the usability testing, participants were asked to perform typical/key tasks/questions which were representing the intended use of the library web site and related the current services and information provided on the site. As the participants performing the tasks / answering questions during usability test, the researcher observed and recorded what they were doing, what they were saying about the site as they were thinking aloud, percentage of tasks they correctly completed, how much time they spent and how many steps they used to perform the tasks. Upon completion of usability testing, participants were asked to fill in a questionnaire to express their satisfaction with the library web site. The findings of the study show that the most difficult tasks for the participants were accessing information through different sources like library catalog, databases and etc. One of the main reasons for this problem was that participants had difficulty in using search engine section of the website. In addition, since they were unfamiliar with jargon used on the web site like catalog, database, open access, e-journal and etc., they could not access information they needed as effectively as desired. Based on the research findings; it is possible to make some suggestions to improve the usability of the web site including providing information and services based on information seeking behaviors and information needs of the users/patrons, reducing jargon and replacing it with simpler words if possible, making the most needed information finding tools like catalog search and database search more noticeable on the main page, and preparing a training for users in how to use the library web site.

Keywords: Usability, web site usability, library web site usability, information access, information seeking

References

  1. Akıncı, D. ve Çağıltay, K. (2004). E-devlet web sitelerini kullanmak ya da kullanamamak: Vatandaş açısından kullanılabilirlik sorunları ve öneriler. 21. Ulusal Bilişim Kurultayı’nda sunulan bildiri, Türkiye Bilişim Derneği, Ankara. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311400337_Edevlet_Web_Sitelerini_Kullanmak_ya_da_Kullanamamak_Vatandas_Acisindan_Kullanilabilirlik_Sorunlari_ve_Oneriler adresinden erişildi.
  2. Bennett, J. L. (1979). The commercial impact of usability in interactive systems. B. Shackel (Ed.), Man–Computer Communication, Infotech State of the Art Report, vol. 2. içinde (ss. 1-17). Maidenhead: Infotech International.
  3. Bennett, J. L. (1984). Managing to meet usability requirements. J. L. Bennett, D. Case, J. Sandelin ve M. Smith (Eds.), Visual Display Terminals: Usability Issues and Health Concerns içinde (ss. 161-184). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Cengiz, E. (2016). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri web sitesinin kullanılabilirliğinin eğitimle desteklenmesi ve değerlendirilmesi: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Bölümü öğrencileri üzerine bir çalışma. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 30(1), 84-95. http://tk.org.tr/index.php/TK/article/view/2618/2606 adresinden erişildi.
  5. Chow, A. S., Bridges, M. ve Commander, P. (2014). The website design and usability of US academic and public libraries: Findings from a nationwide study. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 53(3), 253-265.
  6. Culén, A. L. ve Gasparini, A. A. (2013). Student driven innovation: designing university library services. CENTRIC 2013: The Sixth International Conference on Advances in Human-oriented and Personalized Mechanisms, Technologies, and Services’de sunulan bildiri, Venice, Italy. https://www.thinkmind.org/download.php?articleid=centric_2013_1_30_30082 adresinden erişildi.
  7. Culén, A. L. ve Gasparini, A. A. (2014). Find a book! Unpacking customer journeys at academic library. ACHI 2014: The Seventh International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions içinde (ss. 89-95). Barcelona, Spain: IARIA XPS Press. https://www.thinkmind.org/index.php?view=article&articleid=achi_2014_4_30_20198 adresinden erişildi.
  8. Çağıltay, K. (2011). İnsan bilgisayar etkileşimi ve kullanılabilirlik: Teoriden pratiğe. Ankara: ODTÜ Geliştirme Vakfı Yayıncılık.
  9. Çağıltay, K. (2018). Teoriden pratiğe: İnsan – bilgisayar etkileşimi ve kullanılabilirlik mühendisliği - Araştırma örnekleri – Veri toplama araçları ISO 9241 standartları çerçevesi (2. bs.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  10. Dalcı, M., Alçam, Ö., Saatçioğlu, Y. O. ve Erdal, F. (2008). ODTÜ Kütüphanesi yeni web sayfasının tesarımı ve kullanılabilirlik çalışması. Akademik Bilişim 2008’de sunulan bildiri, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Çanakkale. https://ab.org.tr/ab08/bildiri/80.pdf adresinden erişildi.
  11. Davies, J. E. (2008). What does success look like? Evidence-based assessment of the academic library. 17th Conference of Greek Academic Libraries: Academic library evaluation as a measure of Institutional Quality Assessment’de sunulan bildiri, Ioannina, Greece. https://lekythos.library.ucy.ac.cy/handle/10797/11451 adresinden erişildi.
  12. Dumas, J. S. ve Redish, J. C. (1999). A practical guide to usability testing. Great Britain: Cromwell Press.
  13. EBSCO. (2015). 7 Best practices for creating a user friendly library website. https://www.ebsco.com/blog/article/7-best-practices-for-creating-a-user-friendly-library-website adresinden erişildi.
  14. Foster, N. F. ve Gibbons, S. (2007). Studying students: The undergraduate research project at the University of Rochester. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.
  15. Gillis, R. (2017). Watch your language: word choice in library website usability. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Prectice and Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v12i1.3918
  16. Gürses, E. A. (2006). Kütüphane WEB sitelerinde kullanılabilirlik ve kullanılabilirlik ilkelerine dayalı tasarım (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  17. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (2017). Development and access to information 2017. University of Washington Information School: The International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) & Technology & Social Change Group (TASCHA). The Hague: Netherlands: International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. https://da2i.ifla.org/sites/da2i.ifla.org/files/uploads/docs/da2i-2017-fullreport.pdf adresinden erişildi.
  18. International Organization for Standardization. (1998). ISO 9241-11:1998 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) -- Part 11: Guidance on usability. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-1:v1:en adresinden erişildi.
  19. International Organization for Standardization. (2008). ISO 9241-151:2008: Ergonomics of human system interaction -- Part 151: Guidance on World Wide Web user interfaces. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-151:ed-1:v1:en adresinden erişildi.
  20. Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (23. bs.). Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  21. Kılıç, E. ve Güngör, Z. (2006). Kütüphane web sitelerinin kullanılabilirliği: Bir uygulama çalışması. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(4), 781-789.
  22. Kupersmith, J. (2012). Library terms that users understand. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3qq499w7 adresinden erişildi.
  23. Lehman, T. ve Nikkel, T. (2008). Making library web sites usable: A LITA guide. New York: Neal Schuman Publishers.
  24. McHale, N. (2008). Toward a user-centered academic library home page. Journal of Web Librarianship, 2(2/3), 139-176.
  25. Miller, R. B. (1971). Human ease of use criteria and their tradeoffs. IBM Report TR 00.2185. Poughkeepsie, NY: IBM Corporation.
  26. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. United States of America: Academic Press Inc.
  27. Nielsen, J. (2000). Why you only need to test with 5 users. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/whyyou-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/ adresinden erişildi.
  28. Nielsen, J. (2012a). How Many Test Users in a Usability Study? https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-many-test-users/ adresinden erişildi.
  29. Nielsen, J. (2012b). Thinking aloud: The #1 usability tool. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/thinking-aloud-the-1-usability-tool/ adresinden erişildi.
  30. Nielsen, J. (2012c). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/?lm=usability-engineering&pt=book adresinden erişildi.
  31. Nielsen, J. (2014). Turn user goals into task scenarios for usability testing. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/task-scenarios-usability-testing/ adresinden erişildi.
  32. Nielsen, J. (2017). Jakob’s law of internet user experience. https://www.nngroup.com/videos/jakobs-law-internet-ux/ adresinden erişildi.
  33. Nielsen, J. (2018). Usability test, even when you know the answer. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/test-when-you-know-answer/ adresinden erişildi.
  34. Online Computer Library Center. (2006). College students’ perceptions of the libraries and information resources: A report to the OCLC membership. United States of America: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.
  35. Online Computer Library Center. (2010). Perceptions of libraries, 2010: Context and community. United States of America: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.
  36. Özenç Uçak, N. ve Çakmak, T. (2009). Web sayfası kullanılabilirliğinin ölçülmesi: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Bölümü web sayfası örneği. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 22(2), 278-298. http://www.tk.org.tr/index.php/TK/article/view/459/450 adresinden erişildi.
  37. Polger, M. A. (2011). Student preferences in library website vocabulary. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 618. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1650&context=libphilprac adresinden erişildi.
  38. Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Williams, P., Huntington, P., Fieldhouse, M., Gunter, B., . . . Tenopir, C. (2008). The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future. Aslib Proceedings, 60(4), 290-310.
  39. Rubin, A. ve Babbie, E. (2011). Research methods for social work (7. bs). USA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
  40. Shackel, B. (1981). The concept of usability. J. L. Bennett, D. Case, J. Sandelin ve M. Smith (Eds.), Visual Display Terminals: Usability Issues and Health Concerns içinde (ss. 45-88). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  41. Shackel, B. (2009). Usability – Context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Interacting with Computers, 21, 339–346.
  42. Swanson, T. S. ve Green, J. (2011). Why we are not Google: Lessons from a library web site usability study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(3), 222-229.
  43. T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı ve TÜBİTAK BİLGEM YTE. (2009a). Kamu internet siteleri rehberi - Bölüm 1: İnternet sitelerinde kullanılabilirlik. Ankara: TÜBİTAK BİLGEM YTE.
  44. T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı ve TÜBİTAK BİLGEM YTE. (2009b). Kamu internet siteleri rehberi - Bölüm 6: Kullanılabilirlik testleri ve uygulamaları. Ankara: TÜBİTAK BİLGEM YTE.

License

Copyright (c) 2018 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to Cite

Şerefoğlu Henkoğlu, H., & Demirkol, D. (2018). Measurement of Web Usability: Web Site of Aydın Adnan Menderes University Library. Information World, 19(2), 113-143. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2018.665