Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the suitability of the use of the library course curricula in private universities owned by religious organizations in Nigeria to make undergraduates lifelong learners. It also evaluated the modes and periods of course delivery for their appropriateness and adequacy to achieve the goal of making the students lifelong learners. The survey design was adopted for the study and the content analysis method was used to compare the course contents of the use of the library programmes in the universities with the five information literacy competencies. Results of the study showed that the use of the library curricula contained items that teach the five information literacy competencies including abilities to locate, access, retrieve, evaluate and use information effectively and efficiently. It was also found that the course delivery period in the universities was usually one semester of 12 weeks and the usual mode of delivery was classroom face-to-face approach. The findings implied that the contents of the course were suitable to make students lifelong learners but the mode and period of delivery may not be fit enough for the purpose. The practical implication of the findings of the study is that the universities should review the timing and methods of course delivery such that it would impart lifelong learning skills to the students. The findings of the study would assist universities and other higher education institutions to place high priority on the lifelong learning goals in designing the use of the library programmes.

Keywords: Lifelong learning, use of library, information literacy, user education, universities, academic libraries, Nigeria

References

  1. Adeleke, A. A. (2014). Use of the library and virtual resources. In F. Akere, A. Adebileje, & F. Unuabonah, Use of English I & II (pp. 15-37). Ede: Directorate of General Studies Programme (GSP).
  2. American Library Association [ALA]. (2001). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency
  3. Botha, R. J, & Makoelle, T. M. (2012). Exploring practices determining school effectiveness: A case study in selected South African schools. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 79-90. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2012.11890030
  4. Breivik, P. (2000). ‘Information literacy and lifelong learning: the magical partnership’. In K. Appleton, C. Macpherson, & D. Orr (Eds.), Lifelong Learning Conference: selected papers from the inaugural international Lifelong Learning Conference (pp. 1-6), Yeppoon, Queensland, Australia, 17-19 July 2000. Rockhampton: Lifelong Learning Conference Committee, Central Queensland University. Retrieved from http://hdl.cqu.edu.au/10018/3916
  5. Daggett, W. R. (2014). Achieving Academic Excellence through Rigor and Relevance. Retrieved from http://www.leadered.com/pdf/Achieving_Academic_Excellence_2014.pdf
  6. Demirel, M., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2017). Prospective teachers’ lifelong learning tendencies and information literacy self-efficacy. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(6), 329-337. doi: 10.5897/ERR2016.3119
  7. Desforges, c., & Abouchar, A. (2003). The impact of parental involvement, parental support, and family education on pupil achievement and adjustment: A literature review. London: Department for Education and Skills.
  8. Dudziak, E. A. (2007). Information literacy and lifelong learning in Latin America: The challenge to build social sustainability. Information Development, 23(1), 43-47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666907075630
  9. Facer, K. (2009). Towards an area based curriculum: Insights and directions from research. London: RSA.
  10. Feng, L., & Ha, J. L. (2016). Effects of teachers’ information literacy on lifelong learning and school effectiveness. Eurasia Journal of Mathematical science & Technology, 12(6), 1653-1663. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1575a
  11. Guay, F., Morin, J. S., Litalien, D., Valois, P., & Vallerand, R. J. (2015). Application of exploratory structural equation modelling to evaluate academic motivation scale. The Journal of Experimental Education, 83(1), 51-82. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2013.876231
  12. National Universities Commission [NUC]. (2007). Benchmark minimum academic standards for undergraduate programmes in Nigerian universities. Abuja: NUC.
  13. Pérez, J., & Murray, M. C. (2010). Generativity: the new frontier for information and communication literacy. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge and Management, 5, 127-137. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.com.tr/&httpsredir=1&article=2380&context=facpubs
  14. Rasaki, O. E. (2009). A Comparative Study of Credit Earning Information Literacy Skills Courses of Three African Universities. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1234&context=libphilprac
  15. Stabback, P. (2016). What makes a quality curriculum? In-Progress Reflection No.2 on Current and Critical Issues in Curriculum and Learning. Retrieved from UNESCO website: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002439/243975e.pdf
  16. Stabback, P., Male, B., & Georgescu, D. (2011). What makes a good school curriculum?. [ebook]. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/3008064/What_makes_a_good_quality_school_curriculum
  17. Tella, A. (2016). Information literacy and lifelong learning: A review of literature. In M. Khsrow Pour (Ed.), Professional Development and Workplace Learning: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications (pp. 11-20). USA: Information Resources Management Association. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8632-8.ch002.
  18. The Belem Framework for Action: Harnessing the power and potential of adult learning and education for viable future. UNESCO: CONFINTEA VI: December 2009. (2011). Adult Learning, 22(4), 42-50. doi: 10.1177/104515951102200409.
  19. Thomas, L. (2011). Decentralisation for schools but not for knowledge: The RSA area based curriculum and the limits of localism in coalition education policy Forum, 53(2), 293-304. Doi: http://doi.org/10.2304/forum.2011.53.2.293
  20. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO]. (2014). UNESCO education strategy 2014 – 2021. Paris, 63p. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002312/231288e.pdf

License

Copyright (c) 2019 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to Cite

Adeleke, A. A., Solanke, O. E., & Oguntayo, S. A. (2019). The Use of the Library and Lifelong Learning in Faith-Based Private Universities in Nigeria. Information World, 20(1), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2019.702