Kütüphanelerde Proje Yönetiminin Etkinliği: Sistematik Bir İnceleme
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2023.697Anahtar Kelimeler:
Proje yönetimi, kütüphane, yazılım, avantajlar, zorluklar, proje yönetimi yazılımıÖzet
Proje Yönetimi (PY), çeşitli yazılım ve teknik araçlar aracılığıyla gerçekleştirilmelidir. Proje yönetimi yazılımları sayesinde iş akışını ve zamanlamayı takip etmek ve en iyi kararları vermek kolaylaşmaktadır. Proje yönetimi yazılımları her zaman kütüphanelerin geleneksel yöntemleriyle karşılaştırılmıştır. Bir kütüphane her zaman geleneksel proje yapma yöntemleri ile işleyişini sürdürmekteyse, PY yazılımı, kütüphanelerin planlanan projesine baştan sona sistematik stratejiler geliştirmesine yardımcı olur. Bu sebeple bu araştırmanın temel amacı, kütüphanelerde PY Yazılımı kullanmanın avantajları ve zorlukları hakkında sistematik literatür taraması gerçekleştirmektir. Araştırmada sistematik literatür tarama kontrol listelerinden biri olan Sistematik incelemeler ve Meta-Analizler için Tercih Edilen Raporlama Öğeleri (PRISMA) kullanılmıştır. Ebscohost, Emerald, Scopus, WOS ve ScienceDirect veri tabanlarının gelişmiş arama motorlarında (“Project Management” OR “Project Management Software” OR “PM”) ve (“library” OR “Libraries” OR “librarian”) terimleri aranmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen ana bulgu, kütüphanelerde proje yönetim yazılımı kullanımının birçok zorluklara rağmen planlamaya açıklık getirmesi, teknik araçlar ve yazılımlar kullanılarak planların ve sürecin iyi anlaşılması gibi birçok avantajının olmasıdır. Elde edilen diğer bir önemli sonuç ise, PY yazılımlarının baştan sona planlama sağladığı, üretkenliği ve başarıyı artırmak için sık yapılan değişikliklere kolayca uyarlanabilir olduğunun anlaşılmasıdır. Ayrıca, bu çalışma diğer çalışmalardan farklı olarak proje yönetimi yazılımları ile ilgili literatürdeki eksiklikleri de belirtmekte ve bu yönüyle araştırmacılara yol göstereceği umulmaktadır.
İndirmeler
Referanslar
Ahmad, M. O., Markkula, J., & Oivo, M. (2013). Kanban in software development: A systematic literature review. 2013 39th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2013.28
Aktoprak, A., & Hursen, C. (2022). A bibliometric and content analysis of critical thinking in primary education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101029
Al-Dabbagh, A. (2005). Globalism and the universal language. English Today, 21(2), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078405002026
Bjornen, K. K., & Ippoliti, C. (2022). Making it better: A project management framework for creating a research data services program. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 99. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2623
Blythe, K., Solomon, J., & Gunther, W. K. (2019). The hard task of soft skills: project management for the materials review process. Serials Review, 45(3), 158-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2019.1647745
Burress, T., & Rowell, C. J. (2017). Project management for digital projects with collaborators beyond the library. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 24(2-4), 300-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2017.1336954
Chou, C., Shadle, S., & Teel, K. (2019). Cooperative cataloging projects: managing them for best results. The Serials Librarian, 76(1-4), 110-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2019.1535682
Cobo Serrano, S., & Arquero Avilés, R. (2018). Project management techniques at the Complutense University: academic librarians’ perceptions. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 24(2), 124-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2017.1406378
Collins, M., & Wilson, K. (2018). An agile approach to technical services. The Serials Librarian, 74(1-4), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2018.1443652
D’Amato, K., & Erb, R. A. (2018). The road from millennium to alma: two tracks, one destination. The Serials Librarian, 74(1-4), 217-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2018.1428475
Er-Koçoğlu, N. (2022). Kütüphanecilik ve bilgi bilimi alanında yayımlanan bilimsel makalelerde serbest erişimli bilgi kaynaklarının kapsamı. Bilgi Dünyası, 22(2), 329-349. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2021.641
Guo, J. X. (2019). Measuring information system project success through a software-assisted qualitative content analysis. Information Technology and Libraries, 38(1), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v38i1.10603
Harden, M., & Ajamie, L. (2020). Product ownership and the library website redesign process. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 27(2-4), 385-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2021.1892559
Hartsell-Gundy, A., Lawton, K., & Rozear, H. (2020). 17 librarians and one big undertaking: creating a digital project from start to finish. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 32(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2019.1709730
Henkoğlu, H. Ş. (2021). Türkiye’deki üniversite kütüphane web sitelerinin web içeriği erişilebilirlik kılavuzu kapsamında değerlendirilmesi. Bilgi Dünyası, 22(2), 251-288.
Igbo, H., Ibegbulam, I., Asogwa, B., & Imo, N. (2022). Provision of digital information resources in Nigerian university libraries. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.47989/IRPAPER936
Igwe, K. N., & Sulyman, A. S. (2022). Smart libraries: changing the paradigms of library services. Business Information Review, 39(4), 147-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/02663821221110042
Kelly, M., & O’Gara, G. (2018). Collections assessment: developing sustainable programs and projects. The Serials Librarian, 74(1-4), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2018.1428453
Kinkus, J. (2007). Project management skills: a literature review and content analysis of librarian position announcements. College & Research Libraries, 68(4), 352-363. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.68.4.352
Kipps, K. L., & Jones, A. K. (2020). Things are looking up: using cloud-based technology tools in collection management workflows. Serials Review, 46(3), 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2020.1806646
Koldunov, N. v., & Cristini, L. (2018). Programming as a soft skill for project managers: how to have a computer take over some of your work. Advances in Geosciences, 45, 295-303. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-45-295-2018
Lacuata, A. N. (2020). Digitization of library resources in higher education ınstitutions in La Union, Philippines. Preservation, Digital Technology & Culture, 49(4), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2020-0031
McGeary, B., Guder, C., & Ganeshan, A. (2021). Opening up educational practices through faculty, librarian, and student collaboration in OER creation: Moving from labor-intensive to supervisory ınvolvement. The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v16i1.6149
McLean, J., & Canham, R. (2018). Managing the electronic resources lifecycle with kanban. Open Information Science, 2(1), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2018-0003
Michalak, R., & Rysavy, M. D. T. (2020). Managing remote projects effectively with an action dashboard. Journal of Library Administration, 60(7), 800-811. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2020.1803022
Miller, A. (2018). Innovative management strategies for building and sustaining a digital initiatives department with limited resources. Digital Library Perspectives, 34(2), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-08-2017-0029
Mitchell, E. T. (2018). Lightweight tools and dashboards for program management in libraries. Technical Services Quarterly, 35(1), 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2017.1385295
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339(jul21 1), b2535-b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
Monnin, C. (2020). Asana (product review). Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.29173/jchla29509
Nelson, G. M., Goates, M. C., Pixton, D. S., Frost, M., & Broadbent, D. (2020). Collection weeding: Innovative processes and tools to ease the burden. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(5), 102139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102139
O’Hara, G., Lapworth, E., & Lampert, C. (2020). Cultivating digitization competencies. Information Technology and Libraries, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v39i4.11859
Petters, J. L., Brooks, G. C., Smith, J. A., & Haas, C. A. (2019). The impact of targeted data management training for field research projects - a case study. Data Science Journal, 18. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-043
Porter, S. (2019). Project management in higher education: a grounded theory case study. Library Management, 40(5), 338-352. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-06-2018-0050
Potnis, D. D., & Gala, B. (2020). Managing the “backend” of LIS research projects: A project management perspective. Library & Information Science Research, 42(1), 100996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.100996
Pryima, S. M., Anishchenko, O. V., Dayong, Y., & Ivanova, N. A. (2019). Formation of the project competence of future specialists in information, library and archive services in a digital society. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 70(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v70i2.2639
Ratledge, D., & Sproles, C. (2017). An analysis of the changing role of systems librarians. Library Hi Tech, 35(2), 303-311. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-08-2016-0092
Rojișteanu, C. E. (2017). Google me this: what can project management be for libraries in the age of Google et al.? Journal of Library and Information Science, 13(2), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.26660/rrbsi.2017.13.2.27
Shein, C., Robinson, H. E., & Gutierrez, H. (2018). Agility in the archives: translating agile methods to archival project management. RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts, and Cultural Heritage, 19(2), 94. https://doi.org/10.5860/rbm.19.2.94
Shelby, J. (2019). Convergent evolution of innovative teams in technical services. Serials Review, 45(3), 150-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2019.1644711
Stoddard, M. M., Gillis, B., & Cohn, P. (2019). Agile project management in libraries: creating collaborative, resilient, responsive organizations. Journal of Library Administration, 59(5), 492-511. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2019.1616971
Stojanovic, V. (2021). Trello (product review). Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.29173/jchla29545
Sullo, E. (2017). Academic librarians at istitutions with LIS programs assert that project management training is valuable. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 12(3), 180. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8TM1S
Systematic reviews. (2022). What is PRISMA? https://guelphhumber.libguides.com/c.php?g=213266&p=1406923#:~:text=What%20is%20PRISMA%3F,a%204-phase%20flow%20diagram
Systematic reviews in health. (2023). University of Canberra. https://canberra.libguides.com/systematic/report
Waterhouse, J., & Mann, S. (2021). Mapping domain knowledge for leading and managing change. The Serials Librarian, 80(1-4), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2021.1863140
Wu, Y., Guimaraes, A., & Wang, Z. (John). (2020). Product owners at hesburgh libraries: increasing stakeholder engagement and accountability through continuous organizational enhancement. Journal of Library Administration, 60(7), 695-713. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2020.1797329
Zvyagintseva, L. (2018). Community-led digital exhibits service at the edmonton public library: research and consultation. partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v12i2.3957
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Telif Hakkı (c) 2023 Bilgi Dünyası
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
