Geleneksel Metrikler ile Altmetri Metrikleri Arasındaki İlişkiler: PLoS Analizi Örneği
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2015.470Anahtar Kelimeler:
Bilbiyometri, altmetri, Article Level Metric (ALM)Özet
Dijital ortamda herhangi bir şey yaratma ve kolayca herkese sunma olanağı devasa bir materyal hacmi yaratmaktadır. Bilimsel yayın sayısı arttıkça da akademisyenler için en ilgili ve dikkate değer kaynakları diğerleri arasında seçmek zorlaşmaktadır (Henning ve Gunn, 2012). Bibliyometrik ölçümler akademik dergilerde akademisyenlerin birbirlerine olan etkilerini ölçmektedir. Fakat makalelerin tüm Web üzerindeki etkisi bununla sınırlı değildir. Altmetri (altmetric) ise mevcut bibliyometrik ölçümlerin yanı sıra makalenin tüm Web üzerindeki etkisini içermektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı; PLoS Article Level Metric (ALM) veri setinin analiz edilerek geleneksel metrikler ile altmetri metrikleri arasındaki olası ilişkileri incelemektir.
İndirmeler
Referanslar
Aksnes, D. W., & Taxt, R. E. (2004). Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university. Research evaluation, 13(1), 33-41. Retrieved January 13, 2015 from http://rev.oxfordjournals.org/content/13/1/33.full.pdf.
Al, U. (2008). Türkiye’nin Bilimsel Yayın Politikası: Atıf Dizinlerine Dayalı Bibliyometrik Bir Yaklaşım. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi, June 2008. Retrieved January 13, 2015 from http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~umutal/publications/dissertation/c2.pdf.
Almind, T. & Ingwersen, P. (1997). Informetric analysis on the World Wide Web: Methodological approaches to ‘webometrics’. Journal of Documentation, 53(4). pp. 404-426. Retrieved January 13, 2015 from http://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~muresan/IR/Docs/Articles/jdocAlmind1997.pdf
Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A. & Chute, R. (2009). A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PLoS ONE 4. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006022. Retrieved January 13, 2015 from http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0006022.
Bornmann, L. (2014). Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of alt metrics. Journal of Informatics, 8, 895-903.
Delgado López-Cózar, E., Robinson-García, N., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2012). Manipulating Google Scholar Citations and Google Scholar Metrics: simple, easy and tempting. arXiv preprint arXiv:1212.0638. Retrieved January 13, 2015 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.0638.
Garfield, E (20 June 1994). The Thomson Reuters Impact Factor. Thomson Reuters. Retrieved January 13, 2015 from http://wokinfo.com/essays/impact-factor/.
Groth, P & Gurney, T. (2010). Studying Scientific Discourse on the Web using Bibliometrics: A Chemistry Blogging Case Study. In: Proceedings of the WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society On-Line, April 26-27th, 2010, Raleigh, NC: US. . Retrieved January 13, 2015 from http://wiki.few.vu.nl/sms/images/9/9c/Websci10-FINAL-29-4-2010f.pdf
Haustein, S. & Siebenlist, T. (2011). Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usage, Journal of Informetrics, 5 (3), 446-457, ISSN 1751-1577, 10.1016/j.joi.2011.04.002. Retrieved January 13, 2015 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157711000393.
Henning V. & Gunn W. (2012). “Impact factor: Researchers should define the metrics that matter to them.”. Retrieved January 13, 2015 from http://www.guardian.co.uk/higher-education-network/blog/2012/sep/06/mendeley-altmetricss-open-access-publishing.
Howard, J. (March 12, 2012). Tracking scholarly influence beyond the impact factor. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved January 13, 2015 from http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/tracking-scholarly-influence-beyond-the-impact-factor/35565.
Kear, R. & Colbert-Lewis, D. (2011). Citation searching and bibliometric measures. College & Research Libraries News, 72 (8), 470–474. Retrieved January 13, 2015 from http://crln.acrl.org/content/72/8/470.full.pdf+html.
Mollett, A., Moran, D. & Dunleavy, P. (2011). Using Twitter in university research, teaching and impact activities: A guide for academics and researchers. Retrieved January 13, 2015 from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/files/2011/11/Published-Twitter_Guide_Sept_2011.pdf
Neylon C, Wu S (2009). Article-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact. PLoS Biol 7(11): e1000242. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000242. Retrieved January 13, 2015 from http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000242.
Nowakowski, P. et al. (2011). The Collage Authoring Environment. Procedia Computer Science, 4, 608-617. Retrieved January 13, 2015 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050911001220.
O’Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved January 13, 2013 from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html?page=1.
Priem, J. & Costello, K (2010). How and why scholars cite on twittter?. Retrieved January 13, 2015 from https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/15J41q9EzK3CiMMoIPKY545ACndORpa6Wtj75v1YjrzQ/present?pli=1&ueb=true#slide=id.i0.
Priem, J. & Hemminger, B. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday 15. Retrieved January 13, 2013 from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2874/2570.
Priem, J., Piwowar, H. A., & Hemminger, B. M. (2012). Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.4745.
Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto.
Thomas, O., & Willett, P. (2000). Webometric analysis of departments of librarianship and information science. Journal of information science, 26(6), 421-428.
Procter, R., Williams, R., Stewart, J., Poschen, M., Snee, H., Voss, A. & Asgari-Targhi, M. (2010). Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 368: 4039 –4056. doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0155. Retrieved January 13, 2015 from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/368/1926/4039.short#cited-by.
Reale, E., Barbara, A. & Costantini, A. (2007). Peer review for the evaluation of academic research: lessons from the Italian experience. Research Policy, 16(3),216-228.
Schriger, D., Chehrazi, A., Merchant, R., & Altman, D. (2011). Use of the Internet by Print Medical Journals in 2003 to 2009: A Longitudinal Observational Study. Annals of Emergency Medicine In Press, Retrieved January 13, 2015 http://www.sciencedirect.com.libproxy.lib.unc.edu/science/article/B6WB0-51S6FN7-1/2/2edccd79138b204deee17536d13a2eae.
Shirky, C. (2002). Weblogs and the Mass Amateurization of Publishing. Retrieved January 13, 2015 from http://www.shirky.com/writings/herecomeseverybody/weblogs_publishing.html.
Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody, the power of organizing without organizations. New York, NY: Penguin Group USA.
Smith, A. & Eysenck, M. (2002). The correlation between RAE ratings and citation counts in psychology. Retrieved January 13, 2015 from http://cogprints.org/2749/1/citations.pdf.
Surowiecki, J. (2004). The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many are Smarter than the Few. Retrieved January 13, 2015 from http://www.diplomacy.edu/resources/books/reviews/wisdomcrowds-why-many-are-smarter-few.
Taraborelli, D. (2008). Soft peer review: social software and distributed scientific evaluation. In: Hassanaly, P. andRamrajsingh, A. and Randall, D. and Salembier, P. and Tixier, M., (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, Carry-le-Rouet, 20-23 May 2008. (pp. pp. 99-110). Institut d’Etudes Politiques d’Aix-en Provence: Aix-en-Provence, France. Retrieved January 13, 2015 http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/8279/.
Wardle, D. (2010). Do “Faculty of 1000” (F1000) ratings of ecological publications serve as reasonable predictors of their future impact? Ideas Eco Evo 3. Retrieved January 13, 2015 from http://library.queensu.ca/ojs/index.php/IEE/article/view/2379.
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
